| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Steph Wing
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
48
   |
Posted - 2011.09.27 00:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Conflict of interest
A conflict of interest (COI) occurs when an individual or organization is involved in multiple interests, one of which could possibly corrupt the motivation for an act in the other.
I'm curious what mechanism the OP would propose that would eliminate any possible conflicts of interest in CSM candidates.
Would you disallow members of player organizations from running for CSM? |
Steph Wing
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
48
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 00:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Am I correct in understanding, then, that you'd propose disallowing members of large alliances from running?
What's the cutoff point for a small alliance? |
Steph Wing
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
48
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 01:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
^^ I know one of those two posters is being sarcastic. But I'm honestly not sure which... |
Steph Wing
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
48
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 20:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Steph Wing wrote:Am I correct in understanding, then, that you'd propose disallowing members of large alliances from running?
What's the cutoff point for a small alliance? Personally, I don't think I would have noticed or taken issue with this if Goons had just one member on the CSM if that member wasn't the chairman, including that the person in turn wasn't the director of their alliance and if other aspects of the game were equally represented. As it stands, how can people not view the CSM with scepticism?
That doesn't answer my question. I'll repeat it again so you can take another stab at it:
Do you propose disallowing members of all large alliances from running for CSM, or from being the CSM chair? If so, what is the cutoff point between a large and a small alliance? |
Steph Wing
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
48
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 21:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
While I don't doubt the veracity of that claim, it also does not answer my question.
To recap: My question has to do with eliminating "conflicts of interest" in CSM candidates, not curbing the impressive list of ways people can inflate their votes. |
Steph Wing
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
48
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 21:04:00 -
[6] - Quote
You also missed my edit, look again. |
Steph Wing
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
48
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 21:10:00 -
[7] - Quote
Let me set the record straight here:
I agree. Inflating votes with resubbing and trial accounts and alts ect is horse manure. One player = one vote. How to enforce that is a logistical concern, but I agree in principle.
Now: Go back and check the first post of this thread. Look at the bit where the OP talks about conflicts of interest.
That is the discussion I am trying to have. |
| |
|